Appeal No. 2006-0904 Application No. 09/919,465 in multiple component meltblown webs of the type claimed. Shawyer teaches “[w]ith the addition of the thermoplastic elastomeric polymer the bonds between the strands of the fabric tend not to debond as easily and the abrasion resistance of the fabric is enhanced” (column 3, lines 11-15). Accordingly, we find that it would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art to omit the elastomeric polymer of Shawyer along with the disclosed advantage of obtaining improved abrasion resistance. It is well settled that the omission of a feature disclosed by the prior art along with its attendant function is a matter of obviousness for one of ordinary skill in the art. In re Thompson, 545 F.2d 1290, 1294, 192 USPQ 275, 277 (CCPA 1976); In re Kuhle, 526 F.2d 553, 555, 188 USPQ 7, 9 (CCPA 1975); In re Edge, 359 F.2d 896, 899, 149 USPQ 556, 557 (CCPA 1966); In re Porter, 68 F.2d 971, 973, 20 USPQ 298, 301 (CCPA 1934). Appellants have not demonstrated that polymeric blends not comprising elastomeric polymers exhibit a comparable abrasion resistance to the polymer blends of Shawyer. We appreciate, as urged by appellants, that the polymer blend of Newkirk includes polypropylene, and the group of polymers recited in the appealed claims do not include polypropylene. However, for the reasons set forth above, it 4Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007