Appeal No. 2006-0904 Application No. 09/919,465 appellants’ specification discloses that polypropylene is a preferred polymer and that “[t]he polymer components of the multiple component meltblown fibers may consist essentially of 100% elastomeric polymers” (page 8 of specification, second paragraph). Consequently, appellants have not rebutted the prima facie case of obviousness established by the examiner. In conclusion, based on the foregoing, the examiner’s decision rejecting the appealed claims is affirmed. No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a). AFFIRMED EDWARD C. KIMLIN ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT THOMAS A. WALTZ ) APPEALS AND Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) JEFFREY T. SMITH ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ECK:hh 6Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007