The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte ROBERT STANLEY FARR and MARK NICMANIS ____________ Appeal No. 2006-0912 Application No. 10/081,5751 ______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before GARRIS, PAK, and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges. PAK, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1 through 14. Claims 15 through 21, the only other claims pending in the present application, stand withdrawn from consideration by the examiner as being directed to a non- elected invention. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 1Application for patent filed Feb. 22, 2002, entitled, Effervescent beverage product and method for drinking the same. 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007