Appeal No. 2006-0912 Application No. 10/081,575 medicinal drink. 8. The pressurized beverage product according to claim 7 wherein the beverage is a citrus beverage. REFERENCES The prior art references relied upon by the examiner are: Ash 3,063,841 Nov. 13, 1962 Atkins et al. (Atkins) 3,917,867 Nov. 4, 1975 de la Guardia (Guardia) 5,738,254 Apr. 14, 1998 REJECTIONS The appealed claims stand rejected as follows: (1) Claims 1, 2, 5, 7, 10, 11, 12 and 14 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by the disclosure of Ash; (2) Claims 1 through 4, 11, 13 and 14 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by the disclosure of Guardia; (3) Claim 6 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over the disclosure of Guardia; and (4) Claims 8 and 9 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over the combined disclosures of Guardia and Atkins. 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007