Ex Parte Farr et al - Page 3



          Appeal No. 2006-0912                                                        
          Application No. 10/081,575                                                  

          medicinal drink.                                                            
               8. The pressurized beverage product according to claim 7               
          wherein the beverage is a citrus beverage.                                  

                                     REFERENCES                                       
               The prior art references relied upon by the examiner are:              
          Ash      3,063,841   Nov. 13, 1962                                          
          Atkins et al. (Atkins)  3,917,867   Nov. 4, 1975                            
          de la Guardia (Guardia)  5,738,254   Apr. 14, 1998                          

                                     REJECTIONS                                       
               The appealed claims stand rejected as follows:                         
          (1)  Claims 1, 2, 5, 7, 10, 11, 12 and 14 under 35 U.S.C.                   
               § 102(b) as anticipated by the disclosure of Ash;                      
          (2) Claims 1 through 4, 11, 13 and 14 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b)              
               as anticipated by the disclosure of Guardia;                           
          (3) Claim 6 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over the               
               disclosure of Guardia; and                                             
          (4) Claims 8 and 9 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over            
               the combined disclosures of Guardia and Atkins.                        




                                          3                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007