The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte MAKONNEN BELEW, BO-LENNART JOHANSSON
and, JEAN-LUC MALOISEL
_____________
Appeal No. 2006-0931
Application 10/312,054
Technology Center 1700
______________
Decided: September 29, 2006
_______________
Before PAK, WALTZ, and TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the Examiner’s final rejection of claims
1 through 14, 16 through 20, 22, and 30 through 33. Claims 15, 24, 25, 28, and 29,
the other remaining claims in the above-identified application, stand allowed by the
Examiner. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134.
APPEALED SUBJECT MATTER
Claims 1 and 22 are representative of the subject matter on appeal and read
as follows:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007