Appeal No. 2006-0954 Application No. 10/316,444 Claim 18 Claim 18 requires that the distance between the clamp axis and the pivot axis is less than 50 mm and that the engagement point is equal to or farther from the clamp axis than the pivot axis. Buckley at least would have fairly suggested, to one of ordinary skill in the art, an engagement point that is near the starting position of the handle as shown in figure 1. That engagement point, as indicated by that figure, would be farther from the clamp axis than the pivot axis (24). Buckley does not disclose the distance between the clamp axis and the pivot axis. However, one of ordinary skill in the art would have been led by Buckley’s figure 1 to place the pivot axis sufficiently close, e.g., within 50 mm, to the clamp axis to accommodate small hands. Except for asserting that the limitations in claim 18 distinguish that claim over the references (brief, page 5), the appellant does not direct any argument specifically toward claim 18. For the above reasons we are not convinced of reversible error in the rejection of claim 18. 7Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007