The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte DIRK DANTZ, WILFRIED VON AMMON, DIRK ZEMKE, and FRANZ SEGIETH ____________ Appeal 2006-0993 Application 10/351,739 Technology Center 1700 ____________ Decided: November 3, 2006 ____________ Before PAK, TIMM, and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges. TIMM, Administrative Patent Judge. ORDER REMANDING TO THE EXAMINER A review of the record presently before us leads us to conclude that this case is not in condition for a decision on appeal. Accordingly, we remand the application to the Examiner, via the Office of a Director of the involved Technology Center, to consider the following issues and to take action not inconsistent with the views expressed herein.Page: 1 2 3 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007