Appeal 2006-0993
Application 10/351,739
CONCLUSION
In summary, we remand this Application to the Examiner for action
not inconsistent with the above instructions.
This Remand to the Examiner pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 41.50(a)(1) is
made for further consideration of a rejection. Accordingly, 37 C.F.R.
§ 41.50(a)(2) applies if a supplemental examiner's answer is written in
response to this remand by the Board.
REMANDED
sld
BROOKS KUSHMAN PC
1000 TOWN CENTER
TWENTY-SECOND FLOOR
SOUTHFIELD, MI 48075
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3
Last modified: November 3, 2007