The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte RAMESH LHILA
______________
Appeal No. 2006-0994
Application No. 09/898,969
_______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before GARRIS, WALTZ, and FRANKLIN, Administrative Patent Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the primary examiner’s refusal to allow
claims 1 through 20, which are the only claims pending in this application, as amended
subsequent to the final rejection (see the amendment dated Sep. 30, 2004, as entered
by the examiner as per the Advisory Action dated Oct. 15, 2004; see the Brief, page 2,
ķIV).1 We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134.
1 We refer to and cite from the revised Brief dated June 20,
2005.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007