The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte PAUL A. MEDWICK,
RUSSELL C. CRISS, Dec’d,
DENVRA CRISS, Legal Rep.,
MEHRAN ARBAB,
and
JAMES J. FINLEY
Appeal No. 2006-1002
Application No. 09/945,892
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before KIMLIN, WALTZ and FRANKLIN, Administrative Patent Judges.
KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 29-39,
41-44, 50-57, 59, 62-64, 67 and 68. Claim 29 is illustrative:
29. A solar control coated article, comprising:
a substrate having a surface;
a first antireflective layer having a thickness
ranging from 272 D to 332 D over the surface of the
substrate;
a first infrared reflective layer having a
thickness ranging from 80 D to 269 D over the first
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007