Ex Parte Medwick et al - Page 3



          Appeal No. 2006-1002                                                        
          Application No. 09/945,892                                                  
               The examiner relies upon the following references as                   
          evidence of obviousness:                                                    
          Yudenfriend                  4,489,134              Dec. 18, 1984           
          Proscia                      5,248,545              Sep. 28, 1993           
          Zagdoun et al. (Zagdoun)     5,776,603              Jul.  7, 1998           
          Hartig et al. (Hartig)       5,800,933              Sep.  1, 1998           
          Arbab et al. (Arbab)         5,821,001              Oct. 13, 1998           
          Baratuci et al. (Baratuci)   5,851,609              Dec. 22, 1998           
          Finley                       5,902,505              May  11, 1999           
          Boire et al. (Boire)         6,045,896              Apr.  4, 2000           
               Appellants’ claimed invention is directed to a solar                   
          controlled coated article comprising a substrate containing                 
          first, second and third antireflective layers, first and second             
          infrared reflective layers, and first and second primer layers of           
          titanium over the first and second infrared reflective layers,              
          respectively.  The coated article in an insulated test unit                 
          provides for the test unit to have the recited luminous                     
          transmission, solar heat gain coefficient and ratio of luminous             
          transmittance to solar heat gain coefficient.  Also, the claimed            
          antireflective, infrared reflective and primer layers have                  
          thicknesses within the recited ranges.  The coated article finds            
          utility in windows for buildings or insulating glass units.                 
               The appealed claims stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)            
          as follows:                                                                 
                    (a) claims 29-38, 41-44, 51-54, 56, 57, 59, 62-64, 67             
               and 68 over Finley in view of Zagdoun and Baratuci,                    
                                          3                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007