Ex Parte Malik et al - Page 1



                                                                                   
           The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
                  for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.        

                     UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                    ____________                                    
                        BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                          
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                  
                                    ____________                                    
                        Ex parte AFZAL M. MALIK, WILLIAM C. MOYER                   
                                    ____________                                    
                                 Appeal No. 2006-1007                               
                                Application No. 10/600,959                          
                                    ____________                                    
                                      ON BRIEF                                      
                                    ____________                                    
         Before JERRY SMITH, BARRY, and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judges.  
         JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                  

         ON REQUEST FOR REHEARING                                                   
         Appellants request that we reconsider our decision of May                  
         31, 2006 wherein we reversed the decision of the examiner                  
         rejecting claims 1-6, 8-10 and 13-19.                                      
         Appellants note that the copy of claim 1 that was                          
         included within the decision contained a typographical error at            
         the last line of page 1 of the decision.  Specifically,                    
         appellants note that the word “positions” in the copy of claim 1           
         in the decision should be “portions.”  Appellants request that we          


                                         1                                          


Page:  1  2  3  4  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007