The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ___________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ___________ Ex parte TOMOO HIROTA, YOSUKE MIYAZAKI and MASAAKI TSUTSUBUCHI ____________ Appeal No. 2006-1014 Application No. 10/255,081 _____________ ON BRIEF _____________ Before GARRIS, PAK and TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges. GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal, which involves claims 1-4 and 7-9.1 We AFFIRM. The invention relates to an impact energy-absorbing component in the passenger compartment of an automobile. (Specification, page 1, lines 5-6). 1 The Examiner objected to claims 5-6 as being allowable except for their dependence upon a rejected base claim.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007