Appeal No. 2006-1014 Application No. 10/255,081 Further details regarding this subject matter are set forth in representative independent claim 1 which reads as follows: 1. A resin impact energy absorbing component comprising a high-rigidity brittle fracture portion and a low-rigidity ductile fracture portion. The reference set forth below is relied upon by the Examiner as evidence of anticipation: Suzuki et al. (Suzuki) 6,126,231 Oct. 3, 2000 All of the claims on appeal are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being unpatentable over Suzuki. Rather than reiterate the respective positions advocated by the Appellants and by the Examiner concerning this rejection, we refer to the brief filed May 26, 2005 and to the answer respectively for a complete exposition thereof. OPINION For the reasons provided below, the 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) rejection is sustained. 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007