Ex Parte Hirota et al - Page 2


         Appeal No.  2006-1014                                                      
         Application No. 10/255,081                                                 

              Further details regarding this subject matter are set forth           
         in representative independent claim 1 which reads as follows:              
                   1. A resin impact energy absorbing component                     
              comprising a high-rigidity brittle fracture portion                   
              and a low-rigidity ductile fracture portion.                          

              The reference set forth below is relied upon by the                   
         Examiner as evidence of anticipation:                                      
         Suzuki et al.  (Suzuki)       6,126,231      Oct. 3, 2000                  

              All of the claims on appeal are rejected under 35 U.S.C.              
         § 102(b) as being unpatentable over Suzuki.                                

              Rather than reiterate the respective positions advocated by           
         the Appellants and by the Examiner concerning this rejection, we           
         refer to the brief filed May 26, 2005 and to the answer                    
         respectively for a complete exposition thereof.                            

                                      OPINION                                       
              For the reasons provided below, the 35 U.S.C. § 102(b)                
         rejection is sustained.                                                    





                                         2                                          


Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007