Appeal No. 2006-1055
Application No. 09/752,355
Claims 1-15 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
unpatentable over Muret in view of Tsuchida.
Reference is made to the brief (filed July 5, 2005) and
answer for the respective positions of appellants and the
examiner.
OPINION
With regard to independent claim 1, the examiner contends
that Muret describes a method for tracking the actions of an
Internet user comprising loading data from one or more
transaction logs of one or more Internet servers into a database
system (page 2, paragraph 51, lines 1-2 of Muret), where the data
includes an entry for each request to the Internet server (page
2, paragraph 51, lines 4-6 of Muret), including information
identifying which user submitted the request (page 4, paragraph
71, lines 7-10 of Muret) and information identifying the time at
which the request was received (page 3, paragraph 55, lines 1-5
of Muret), wherein all entries associated with a particular user
and corresponding to a single session of that user is selected
from the data (page 4, paragraph 71 of Muret).
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007