Appeal Number: 2006-1059
Application Number: 09/780,603
As for the rejection of claims 4 and 5 under 35 U.S.C.
103(a) based on Miles in view of Bonzer and Block, taken further
in view of Doyle, we agree with appellant’s assessment set forth
in the brief (pages 8-9). Simply stated, there is nothing in
Doyle that provides for or otherwise overcomes the deficiencies
noted above in the basic combination to Miles, Bonzer and Block.
Thus, we will not sustain the examiner’s rejection of dependent
claims 4 and 5 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a).
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007