Ex Parte Wright et al - Page 1




                              The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not                                
                               written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                               

                                 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                      
                                                        ____________                                                            
                                       BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                       
                                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                                            
                                                        ____________                                                            
                                 Ex parte ALLEN B. WRIGHT and LEDU QUOC NGUYEN                                                  
                                                        ____________                                                            
                                                    Appeal No. 2006-1076                                                        
                                                 Application No. 10/147,252                                                     
                                                        ____________                                                            
                                                          ON BRIEF                                                              
                                                        ____________                                                            
               Before TIMM, JEFFREY T.  SMITH and GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judges.                                       
               GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                           
                                                   DECISION ON APPEAL                                                           
                      This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Final Rejection mailed March 28, 2005.                   
               Claims 21-29, 31-44, 46, 47 and 49-51 are pending.  Claims 1-20, 30 and 45 have been canceled.                   
               All of the pending claims have been finally rejected.  The rejections of claims 21-29, 31-37 and                 
               41-44 are appealed.  Appellants do not appeal the rejections of the remaining claims (i.e., claims               
               38-40, 46, 47 and 49-51).                                                                                        
                      Independent claims 21 and 32 and dependent claims 26 and 37 are illustrative of the                       
               subject matter on appeal and are reproduced below:                                                               
                              21. A method of making a filter module, the method comprising the steps                           
                      of directing a laser beam at an end cap so as to fuse a least a portion of the end                        

                                                            Page 1                                                              





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007