The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte AARON M. DATESMAN, SUSAN L.R. BAKER, MICHAEL L. WAGNER, DAVID ANGELEY, and ERIC BLACK __________ Appeal No. 2006-1095 Application No. 10/280,188 __________ ON BRIEF __________ Before JERRY SMITH, RUGGIERO, and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges. JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s rejection of claims 1-3, 6-10, 12-15, 18-23, and 26. Claims 4, 5, 11, 16, 17, 24, and 25 have been indicated by the examiner to contain allowable subject matter. Claims 27 and 28 have been cancelled.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007