Ex Parte REINBERG - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2006-1107                                                        
          Application No. 09/382,442                                                  

          the hydrogen isotope into the semiconductor layer.                          
          Representative claim 1 is reproduced as follows:                            
               1.      A method for reducing random single bit data                   
               loss in a FLASH memory circuit having a programming                    
               operation and an erase operation, comprising:                          
                    providing a semiconductor layer having a surface;                 
               heating the layer in an atmosphere comprising a                        
               Hydrogen isotope wherein the Hydrogen isotope is                       
               incorporated into the layer; and                                       
          fabricating a memory circuit having a programming                           
          operation and an erase operation, comprising single bit                     
          data using the semiconductor layer, the fabricating                         
          comprising fabricating a gate region in the layer;                          
          treating a portion of the surface to form a thin layer of                   
          insulator film adjacent to the gate region and under the                    
          gate region; and heating the thin layer in an atmosphere                    
          comprising Hydrogen isotope, wherein single bit data loss                   
          is reduced and wherein random single bit data loss is                       
          prevented in both the programming operation and the erase                   
          operation.                                                                  
          The examiner relies on the following references:                            
          Sheu                          4,840,917            Jun. 20, 1989            
          Nakanishi                     5,145,797            Sep. 08, 1992            
          Nakajima et al. (Nakajima)    5,397,724            Mar. 14, 1995            
          Lisenker et al. (Lisenker)    WO 94/19829          Sep. 01, 1994            
          (published World Int. Prop. Org. Patent Application)                        
          The admitted prior art.                                                     
          Claims 1, 2 and 4-14 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                         
          § 103(a).  As evidence of obviousness the examiner offers                   
          Nakanishi in view of Lisenker and the admitted prior art with               

                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007