Ex Parte Underhill et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2006-1115                                                        
          Application No. 10/397,748                                                  
               13.    A tissue sheet having at least two distinct, regular,           
               overall texture patterns and an optical interference                   
               pattern.                                                               
               The references set forth below are relied upon by the                  
          examiner in the Section 102 and Section 103 rejections before us:           
          Burt                     4,671,983                  Jun.  9, 1987           
          Roussel                  6,423,397                  Jul. 23, 2002           
                                                                                     
               Claims 13 and 14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as              
          being anticipated by Roussel and under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as                
          being anticipated by Burt.  Claims 15-21 are rejected under 35              
          U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over either Roussel or                
          Burt.                                                                       
               With respect to each of the above noted rejections, no                 
          specific claim has been separately argued in accordance with                
          37 CFR § 41.37(c)(1)(vii)(September 13, 2004).  Therefore,                  
          the claims in these respective rejections will stand or fall                
          together.                                                                   
               We refer to the brief and to the answer respectively for a             
          complete exposition of the opposing viewpoints expressed by the             
          appellants and by the examiner concerning these rejections.                 
                                       OPINION                                        
               For the reasons set forth in the answer and below, we will             
          sustain each of the rejections before us:                                   

                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007