The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte PIERRE JEANVOINE, TANGUY MASSART, RAMON RODRIGUEZ,
ARMANDO RODRIGUEZ and JUAN-ANDRES NUNEZ
_____________
Appeal No. 2006-1119
Application No. 09/381,631
______________
HEARD: MAY 23, 2006
_______________
Before KIMLIN, WARREN and FRANKLIN, Administrative Patent Judges.
KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 38-40,
42-46, 50, 56, 77, 78, 98, 101-106, 115 and 116. Claims 41, 47-
49, 51-55, 57-76, 79-97, 99 and 107-114 stand withdrawn from
consideration as being directed to a non-elected invention.
Claim 38 is illustrative:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007