Appeal No. 2006-1119
Application No. 09/381,631
examiner’s reasoning that it would have been obvious for one of
ordinary skill in the art to include laminated glass or mineral
fibers with organic binders in the waste feed of Floyd.
As a final point, we note that appellants base no argument
upon objective evidence of nonobviousness, such as unexpected
results, which would serve to rebut the prima facie case of
obviousness established by the examiner.
In conclusion, based on the foregoing and the reasons well-
stated by the examiner, the examiner’s decision rejecting the
appealed claims is affirmed.
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007