Appeal No. 2006-1128
Application No. 10/215,877
Claims 19-23
We note that the appellants argue claims 19-23 as a group. Accordingly, we select
claim 19 as representative of the group. The appellants argue these claims the same
as they argued claims 13-18 and are therefore unpersuasive for the same reasons.
None of the appellants’ arguments are found persuasive. Accordingly, we sustain the
examiner’s rejection of claims 19-23 as rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable as obvious over Caulfield in view of Lynn.
We have above sustained the examiner’s rejections of claims 7-12, 13-18 and 19-
23. Accordingly, we sustain the examiner’s rejection of claims 7-23 as rejected under
35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable as obvious over Caulfield in view of Lynn.
10
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007