The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte MADHAV DATTA, DAVE EMORY, SUBHASH M. JOSHI,
SUSANNE MENEZES, and DOOWON SUH
__________
Appeal No. 2006-1193
Application No. 09/961,036
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before THOMAS, JERRY SMITH, and LEVY, Administrative Patent Judges.
JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner’s rejection of claims 17-19, 21, 23, and 25.
The disclosed invention pertains to a dual-stack, ball-limiting
metallurgy and method of making same.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007