Appeal No. 2006-1204 Application No. 10/379,006 CONCLUSION In view of the foregoing discussion, we have not sustained the Examiner’s decision rejecting claims 1, 2, 5, 9-11, 13, 14, 22, 24, 25, 50 and 55 under 35 U.S.C. § 102. We have also not sustained the Examiner’s decision rejecting claims 40 and 45 under 35 U.S.C. § 103. Therefore, we reverse. REVERSED KENNETH W. HAIRSTON ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT ERROL A. KRASS ) Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) ) INTERFERENCES ) JEAN R. HOMERE ) Administrative Patent Judge ) JRH/ce 15Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007