The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ___________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ___________ Ex parte GUILLERMO R. VILLALOBOS, JAS S. SANGHERA, SHYAM S. BAYYA and ISHWAR D. AGGARWAL ____________ Appeal No. 2006-1218 Application No. 10/601,884 _____________ ON BRIEF _____________ Before KIMLIN, GARRIS and PAK, Administrative Patent Judges. GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal, which involves claims 1, 4-5, and 19-20. The subject matter of this application is drawn to a transparent sintered ceramic product. This product may be used for windows, automotive glass, laptop computers, cell phones, aerospace windshields, and industrial blast shields among other things (page 2, lines 7-9). The sintered ceramic productPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007