Ex Parte Karl - Page 14



            Appeal No. 2006-1228                                                                      
            Application No. 09/802,982                                                                

                                              DECISION                                                
                 The rejections of claims 12, 15 and 17-23 under                                      
            35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, written description                                     
            requirement, and claims 2, 8, 9, 11 and 12 under 35 U.S.C. § 112,                         
            second paragraph, are reversed.  The rejections of claims 1, 2,                           
            10, 11, 13 and 14 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over Noda in view of                              
            Enomoto, and claims 8 and 9 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over Noda in                            
            view of Enomoto and Echigoya, are affirmed.  The rejections of                            
            claims 12, 15 and 17-23 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over Noda in view                           
            of Enomoto and Whalen, Momose or Patry, claims 15 and 17 under 35                         
            U.S.C. § 103 over Noda in view of Enomoto and Obara, claims 18                            
            and 19 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over Noda in view of Enomoto and                             
            Suzuki, and claims 12 and 20-23 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over Noda                           
            in view of Enomo1to, Obara and Suzuki, are reversed.                                      










                                                 14                                                   




Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007