Ex Parte Buch - Page 6


               Appeal No. 2006-1304                                                                          Page 6                  
               Application No. 10/214,058                                                                                            

                       Jukema prefaces its conclusions with two caveats:  “Whether all CCBs or only                                  
               some of these drugs are capable of extending the antiatherosclerotic effect of                                        
               pravastatin is not yet known,” and “[t]he REGRESS trial was not designed to study the                                 
               effect of CCB administration.  In this regard, it is a retrospective analysis and therefore                           
               no definite conclusions can be drawn concerning the beneficial effect of adding a CCB                                 
               to lipid-lowering therapy.”  Page 429, right-hand column.                                                             
                       Jukema concludes that, “[r]ecognizing these limitations, it may be stated that this                           
               is the first report to provide substantial evidence that CCBs may have a beneficial effect                            
               on the evolution of coronary atherosclerosis in patients treated with lipid-lowering                                  
               therapy.  Our results appear to warrant a prospective randomized trial to determine in a                              
               more definitive manner the merits of this combination in the prevention of progression of                             
               coronary atherosclerosis.”  Id.                                                                                       
                       We recognize that Jukema attaches some conditions to the conclusions it draws                                 
               from the data of the REGRESS study.  Research papers published in peer-reviewed                                       
               scientific journals are often cautious about drawing conclusions that go beyond the                                   
               specific data presented.  See, e.g., Bakker-Arkema:5                                                                  
                       Atorvastatin . . . appears to be unique in the magnitude of the associated                                    
                       decrease in VLDL-C. . . . This well-tolerated drug, therefore, may provide                                    
                       single-agent therapy for some of the most difficult problems faced in                                         
                       clinical lipidemiology. . . . Specific explanations for the differences in                                    
                       efficacy are under study.  However, at this time, atorvastatin appears to                                     
                       offer greater efficacy in the reduction of triglycerides, LDL, and VLDL                                       
                       levels than other reductase inhibitors with similar safety profiles.                                          


                                                                                                                                     
               5 Bakker-Arkema et al., “Efficacy and safety of a new HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, atorvastatin, in                   
               patients with hypertriglyceridemia,” Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 275, pp. 128-133               
               (1996).                                                                                                               





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007