The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JOO HAE SONG, CHOONGIL KIM, GEORGE LORENZ,
and HENRY VALDEZ
____________
Appeal 2006-1306
Application 10/218,991
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: September 20, 2006
____________
Before GARRIS, KRATZ, and TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.
GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal involves claims 1-2, 4, 6-7, 9-14, 16-22, 24-27 and 32-33,
the only claims pending in this application. We have jurisdiction over the
appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134.
We AFFIRM-IN-PART and REMAND.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007