Appeal 2006-1306
Application 10/218,991
CONCLUSION
We have reversed the Examiner’s § 102(b) rejection of claims 1-2, 4,
6-7, 9-14, 16-22, 24-27 over Reed.
We have affirmed the Examiner’s § 102(b) rejection of claims 32-33
over Reed.
We have reversed the Examiner’s § 102(b) rejection of claims 1 and 4
over Mentink.
We have remanded this application to the Examiner for action
consistent with our above comments.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(1)(iv)(2004).
AFFIRMED-IN-PART & REMANDED
BRG:hh
Robert M. Barrett
Bell, Boyd & Lloyd LLC
P.O. Box 1135
Chicago, IL 60690-1135
13
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Last modified: November 3, 2007