The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte STEVEN J. JOHNSON and KRZYSZTOF W. KORCZ
____________
Appeal No. 2006-1347
Application No. 10/651,205
Technology Center 3600
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before BAHR, LEVY and HORNER, Administrative Patent Judges.
HORNER, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from the examiner's
final rejection of claims 1-16, 18-21, 29, and 30. Claims 17 and 22 have been
objected to as being dependent on a rejected base claim, and claims 23-28 have
been allowed.
We affirm.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007