Ex Parte OHTANI et al - Page 1




                          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                              
                          for publication in a law journal and is not binding precedent of the Board.                             

                                   UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                      
                                                          ____________                                                            
                                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                       
                                                     AND INTERFERENCES                                                            
                                                          ____________                                                            
                      Ex parte HISASHI OHTANI, MISAKO NAKAZAWA, and SATOSHI MURAKAMI                                              
                                                          ____________                                                            
                                                      Appeal No. 2006-1372                                                        
                                                    Application No. 09/197,767                                                    
                                                     Technology Center 2800                                                       
                                                          ____________                                                            
                                                    HEARD:  October 18, 2006                                                      
                                                          ____________                                                            
                   Before  JERRY SMITH,  GROSS, and LEVY, Administrative Patent Judges.                                           
                   GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                            



                                                     DECISION ON APPEAL                                                           
                          This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1                            
                   through 5, 16, 22 through 27, 40, and 46 through 74, which are all of the claims pending                       
                   in this application.                                                                                           
                          Appellants’ invention relates to a semiconductor device having transistor, an                           
                   interlayer insulating film, and a reflective pixel electrode over the insulating film.  An                     
                   embedded conductive layer fills a contact hole in the interlayer insulating layer to                           
                   connect the pixel electrode with the transistor, and the surface of the embedded                               
                   conductive layer is flush with the interlayer insulating layer.  Claim 1 is illustrative of the                
                   claimed invention, and it reads as follows:                                                                    








Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007