The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte INA PAHL,
HANS-WEDDO SCHMIDT AND
ULRICH GRUMMERT
______________
Appeal No. 2006-1391
Application No. 10/168,806
_______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before PAK, WALTZ, and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the primary examiner’s refusal to allow
claims 1 through 6, the only claims pending in this application, as amended subsequent
to the final rejection (see the amendment dated Nov. 14, 2005, entered as per the
Advisory Action dated Nov. 29, 2005). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §
134.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007