Appeal No. 2006-1492
Application No. 09/884,489
is disabled. However, in HistoryKill, the session for the user
identified on the Screen Capture on page 1 is disabled, or
deleted, so that the history of where that user has been surfing
is erased.
That would be enough to defeat the instant claimed subject
matter. While appellants clearly intend for there to be a
plurality of sessions and that a user may identify one such
session for disablement, the broad language of instant claim 1,
for example, does not require that. The claimed “identified
session” may very well be the single session erased or disabled
in HistoryKill. Thus, when one enters a user name and checks one
of the boxes, e.g., “History file,” in the Screen Capture of
HistoryKill, and then clicks on the “Kill” button, all of the
history file will be deleted. But “all” of this history file
would be the claimed “identified session.” An identified session
may constitute, broadly, an entire session. Since HistoryKill
employs a user ID to effectuate the disablement, or deletion, it
is clear that the identified session is “based on the selected
user identification, as claimed.
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007