Appeal No. 2006-1492
Application No. 09/884,489
domains for a browser session in order to discard history
information for the selected domain based on a selected user
identification. Thus, appellants are arguing that claim 18
discards history information for a selected domain based on a
selected user identification, but HistoryKill makes no reference
to selecting a domain from a list of identified domains based on
selected user identification.
We disagree with appellants. Again, there is no reason why
an entire domain in HistoryKill, e.g., the “domain of “History
files,” cannot be the “identified” domain. Thus, in HistoryKill,
the selection of the box “History files” constitutes a domain
selection. Moreover, this domain is selected from a list of
identified domains based on selected user identification because
the user enters the ID information on the Screen Capture in
HistoryKill and it is this user ID, along with the checked box of
the domain of interest, that permits the disablement, or
deletion, when the “Kill” button is clicked.
Accordingly, we will sustain the rejection of claims 18, 19,
23, 41, 42, and 46 under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007