The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of
the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte BRENDA POMERANCE
_____________
Appeal No. 2006-1523
Application No. 09/793,687
Technology Center 3600
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before CRAWFORD, NAPPI and FETTNG Administrative Patent Judges.
NAPPI, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. §134(a) of the final rejection of
claims 1 through 6, 8, 9, 11 and 14 through 26, claims 7, 10, 12 and 13 have been
canceled. For the reasons stated infra we affirm in part the examiner’s rejection of these
claims.
Invention
The invention relates to an automated complaint resolution system. See page 3 of
appellant’s specification. Claim 1 is representative of the invention and reproduced
below:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007