Appeal No. 2006-1523
Application No. 09/793,687
Conclusion
In summary, we sustain the examiner’s rejection of claims 1 through 3, 5, 6, 8, 9,
14 through 19 and 21 through 24 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 (a). However, we will not
sustain the examiner’s rejection of claims 1, through 6, 8, 9, 11 and 14 through 26 stand
rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 101, nor will we sustain the examiner’s rejection of claims 4,
11, 20, 25 and 26 under 35 U.S.C. § 103. The decision of the examiner is affirmed-in-
part.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be
extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a)(1)(iv).
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
MURRIEL E. CRAWFORD )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
ROBERT E. NAPPI ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
ANTON W. FETTING )
Administrative Patent Judge )
REN/vsh
11
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007