Ex Parte Corbella et al - Page 4



          Appeal No. 2006-1530                                        Παγε 4                          
          Application No. 10/221,959                                                                  
               At the outset, we note that appellants (brief, page 7) have                            
          grouped claims 113-14, 17 and 18 together and furnish separate                              
          argument headings for claims 15, 16, 19, 20 and 21.  Thus, we                               
          shall consider appealed claim 11 as representative of rejected                              
          claims 11-14, 17 and 18 in deciding this appeal.  Claims 15, 16,                            
          19, 20 and 21 shall be separately considered to the extent the                              
          latter claims are separately argued in the brief in a manner                                
          consistent with 37 CFR § 41.37(c)(vii).                                                     
               Representative appealed claim 11 requires a composition that                           
          includes, inter alia, (1) a dye, (2) an alkyl and/or alkenyl                                
          oligoglycoside, and (3) a cationic biopolymer, such as a                                    
          chitosan, chitosan derivative or combination thereof (dependent                             
          claim 12).                                                                                  
               Pitfield discloses a hair coloring preparation that can                                
          include, inter alia, a hair dye (column 3, line 29 through column                           
          4, line 19 of U.S. Pat. No. 6,572,663), an alkyl oligoglycoside                             
          (column 5, lines 3-5 of U.S. Patent No. 6,572,663), and a                                   
                                                                                                      
               3 Appellants inadvertently refer to claims 1-14, instead of rejected claims 11-14 at   
          page 7 of the brief.                                                                        

















Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007