The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ___________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ___________ Ex parte PAUL R. GAGNON ____________ Appeal No. 2006-1562 Application No. 10/720,948 _____________ ON BRIEF _____________ Before GARRIS, WALTZ and TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges. GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal, which involves claims 1-18. We REVERSE and REMAND. The subject matter of this appeal is directed generally to a sports vision-training device, and a method for its use, for directing an individual’s field of vision up and toward the field of play. The training device also restricts, in some cases completely, the individual’s field of vision with regardPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007