Ex Parte Gagnon - Page 3


         Appeal No.  2006-1562                                                      
         Application No. 10/720,948                                                 
              18. A method for training an individual playing a sport,              
              said method comprising the steps of:                                  
                   providing at least one member having an adhesive                 
              coating or layer and a thickness sufficient to interfere              
              with said individual’s field of vision; and                           
                   positioning said at least one member on at least one             
              cheek under an eye of said individual so that said                    
              thickness interferes with the individual’s ability to look            
              downwardly at a sports object being controlled by the                 
              individual and to restrict said individual’s field of                 
              vision to looking forward up and towards a field of play              
              and at least one person on said field of play.                        
              The references set forth below are relied upon by the                 
         Examiner as evidence of anticipation or obviousness:1                      
         Maged      WO 96/32979  Oct. 24, 1996                                      
         Micchia et al. (Micchia)      4,719,909   Jan. 19, 1988                    
         Morgan et al. (Morgan)  4,951,658   Aug. 28, 1990                          
              The following reference is cited by the Board and is                  
         discussed in the remand below for consideration by the Examiner:           
         Arnold et al. (Arnold)  6,320,094   Nov. 20, 2001                          
              Claims 1-2 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being             
         unpatentable over Maged.                                                   


                                                                                   
         1 The Examiner has referred to U.S. Patent 5,939,142 to Comiskey           
         et al. in the Response to Arguments section of her answer. We              
         have not considered this reference because it was not included             
         in a statement of rejection.  See In re Hoch, 428 F.2d 1341,               
         1342 n.3, 166 USPQ 406, 407 n.3 (C.C.P.A. 1970) and Manual of              
         Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP) § 1207.03 (Rev. 3, August                
         2005).                                                                     
                                         3                                          


Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007