Ex Parte Dang - Page 3




               Appeal No. 2006-1627                                                                                               
               Application No. 09/934,945                                                                                         


                              Since the applet functions as any ordinary application window on                                    
                              the desktop, and that the applet components includes dialog boxes                                   
                              and pop-up windows (1:42-44, 8:59-62), it inherently appears that                                   
                              applet have [sic, the applet has] the functionality of displaying a                                 
                              second window simultaneously (i.e., the second window is                                            
                              displayed while, during the applet window is displayed) with the                                    
                              applet window.  I.e., any “ordinary application window” may have                                    
                              sub-windows its hierarchy. . . .  Although Razavi clearly discloses                                 
                              that the applet has the functionality of simultaneously displaying                                  
                              the second window as set forth above, Razavi fails to clearly teach                                 
                              the displaying of the second window.                                                                
                      Although Razavi does not expressly state that a second applet window is displayed, we                       
               find that a dialog box as well as a pop-up window described in Razavi will produce a second                        
               applet window displayed on the applet window1, albeit not as large as the applet window.  Such                     
               a second window is required by the claims on appeal to be outside of the browser application                       
               window, but not outside of the applet window.  We additionally find that Nguyen expressly                          
               states that an applet displays a small pop-up window or dialog box in conjunction with the applet                  
               display (column 9, lines 46 through 55; column 12, lines 20 through 34).  The teachings of                         
               Nguyen are, therefore, merely cumulative to the teachings of Razavi.  In view of the teachings of                  
               Razavi and Nguyen, we disagree with appellant’s arguments (reply brief, pages 5 and 6) that                        
               neither reference teaches an applet that simultaneously displays a second window.  Thus, the                       
               obviousness rejection of claims 12, 20 and 28 is sustained based upon the teachings of Razavi                      
               and Nguyen.  The obviousness rejection of claims 13 through 15, 21 through 23 and 29 through                       


                                                                                                                                 
               1 In the prior art described in Razavi, the pop-up window or dialog box was constrained to be inside the application
               window (column 1, lines 40 through 44).  When the separate applet window is created, the pop-up window or dialog   
               box is created over the applet window (column 8, line 59 through column 9, line 3).                                
                                                                3                                                                 




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007