Appeal No. 2006-1627
Application No. 09/934,945
The obviousness rejection of claims 19, 27 and 35 is sustained because the applet in
Razavi can monitor hardware/software at two locations when the URL of a new host is accessed
with the applet still running (column 7, lines 45 through 47).
DECISION
The decision of the examiner rejecting claims 12 through 35 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) is
affirmed as to claims 12 through 15, 17 through 23, 25 through 31 and 33 through 35, and is
reversed as to claims 16, 24 and 32.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be
extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a)(1)(iv).
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
KENNETH W. HAIRSTON )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
LANCE LEONARD BARRY )
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
)
) INTERFERENCES
)
ALLEN R. MACDONALD )
Administrative Patent Judge )
KWH/rwk
5
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007