Ex Parte Heide et al - Page 3




               Appeal No. 2006-1629                                                                                               
               Application No. 10/104,569                                                                                         

               equilibrium with the pressure of the container through a small outer bore in the pressure                          
               chamber, wherein, after opening the container, the resulting relative overpressure in the pressure                 
               chamber in relation to the decreased pressure in the container effects an opening of the                           
               component chamber, wherein the insert member has in the axial direction an identical cross-                        
               section over the length of the insert member and wherein in the radial direction the cross-section                 
               of the insert member has a median point or a median point axis moved to one side of the insert                     
               member, wherein the cross-section of the insert member is drop-shaped or egg-shaped, wherein                       
               the outer bore is located at a location farthest removed from the median point or median point                     
               axis in an outer wall of the insert member, wherein the component chamber is moved within the                      
               pressure chamber toward an end of the pressure chamber opposite the outer bore to such an                          
               extent that the insert which is freely moveable within the container on a surface of the liquid                    
               assumes a stable floating position, so that the outer bore is always located above the liquid level                
               and causes an optimized pressure equalization of the pressure chamber and the pressure the                         
               container, further including a lid, the component chamber having a wall and one end of the wall                    
               engages an annular groove of the lid when the insert is closed.                                                    
                      Upon careful review of the respective positions advanced by the Appellants and the                          
               Examiner, we affirm the rejection of claims 4, 7, and 9 to 14 for the reasons expressed in the                     
               Answer, and we add the following for emphasis.                                                                     
                      Appellants (Brief, page 9) argue that unlike the prior art, in the present invention the                    
               component chamber moves freely within the pressure chamber towards the end of the pressure                         
               chamber opposite the outer bore.  This argument is not persuasive because the invention of                         
               Reichinger discloses an outer bore (8) of a gas-containing compartment (7) that includes the                       
               component-containing chamber (6) wherein the inner walls of the compartment chamber do not                         
               extend to the outer walls of the second component chamber.  (See page 6, lines 16 to 31).  As                      
               recognized by Appellants, the insert of Reichinger does not necessarily have to be attached to the                 
               bottom of the container.  (Brief,  page 9). Consequently, when the beverage insert is not attached                 
               to the bottom of the surrounding beverage container and when the inner walls of the component                      



                                                               -3-                                                                




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007