The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
___________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
___________
Ex parte HARRY BUSSEY, JR.
And
HARRY BUSSEY, III
____________
Appeal No. 2006-1666
Application No. 10/211,683
_____________
ON BRIEF
_____________
Before KIMLIN, WARREN, and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1, 7,
8, 17, 18 and 39. Claims 2-5 and 9 have been allowed, and claim
19 would be allowable if rewritten in independent form. Claims
1 and 17 are illustrative:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007