Appeal No. 2006-1670 Page 2 Application No. 10/336,729 BACKGROUND The appellants’ invention relates to bed clothing with means for facilitating the changing of an absorbent panel thereof (present specification, p. 1). A copy of the claims under appeal is set forth in the appendix to the appellants’ brief. The examiner relies upon the following as evidence of unpatentability: Fukuroi US 4,015,457 Apr. 5, 1977 O’Connell US 4,097,943 Jul. 4, 1978 Blake US 5,086,530 Feb. 11, 1992 Ghanem US 6,651,278 B2 Nov. 25, 2003 (Oct. 12, 2001) The following rejections are before us for review. Claims 27-52 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, as containing subject matter which was not described in the appellants’ specification so as to convey that the appellants had possession of the invention at the time the application was filed, i.e., failing to comply with the written description requirement. Claims 27-29, 31, 34-47 and 49-51 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being anticipated by Ghanem. Claims 1, 2, 5, 8-10, 12-15, 17-21, 23-25, 27, 28, 31, 34-36, 38, 40, 41, 43-47 and 49-51 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Blake in view of Ghanem. Claims 1, 2, 5, 8-10, 12, 13, 16-21, 23-25, 27, 28, 31, 34-36, 38, 42-47 and 49-51 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Ghanem in view of Blake. Claims 3 and 29 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Blake in view of Ghanem or Ghanem in view of Blake, as applied to claim 2 above, and further in view of Fukuroi. Claims 11, 13, 37 and 39 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Blake in view of Ghanem or Ghanem in view of Blake, as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of O’Connell.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007