Ex Parte McGrath et al - Page 4




               Appeal No. 2006-1670                                                                        Page 4                
               Application No. 10/336,729                                                                                        


               auxiliary feather mattress” in paragraph 32 on page 11.  With respect to the fourth item, we note                 
               that paragraph 32 is so obtuse as to offer little in the way of description of the absorbent panel,               
               other than some indication that the panel may provide some degree of comfort.                                     
                      To the extent that the term “padded” is understood in the broad sense of “stuffed, lined or                
               covered with a pad or padding [i.e., any soft material used to pad]” (Webster's New World                         
               Dictionary, Third College Edition (Simon & Schuster, Inc. 1988)), we find that the above                          
               sources of disclosure in the appellants’ original specification provide support for the recitation of             
               a “padded” panel.  Consistent with the appellants’ underlying disclosure, we interpret a “padded”                 
               panel to be any material in the bedding art described as being either absorbent, in the context of                
               absorbing bodily fluids, or soft so as to provide comfort.  With this understanding, we shall not                 
               sustain the examiner’s rejection of claims 27-52 under the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. § 112 as                  
               lacking written description support.                                                                              
                      We turn next to the rejection of claims 27-29, 31, 34-47 and 49-51 as being anticipated                    
               by Ghanem.  The appellants have not argued any of the claims included in this rejection                           
               separately from the other claims so included.  Therefore, in accordance with 37 CFR §                             
               41.37(c)(1)(vii), we select claim 45 as the representative claim to decide the appeal of this                     
               rejection, with claims 27-29, 31, 34-44, 46, 47 and 49-51 standing or falling therewith.                          
                      Ghanem discloses a quick change bed sheet set comprising a lower panel 12 for fitting                      
               onto a mattress 10, an air permeable, absorbent, porous (col. 4, ll. 23-24) upper panel 16 and a                  
               minor panel 24 for releasable attachment to the upper panel.  The lower panel 12 is provided                      
               with a fastener 14 that extends “around the perimeter of the lower panel” such that, when the                     
               lower panel is fitted onto the mattress, the fastener 14 is “disposed about the periphery of the                  
               mattress” (col. 3, first full para.).  The upper panel 16 is formed with a fly 13 to overlay the                  
               lower panel and has a first fastener 18 attached to the periphery thereof.  The first fastener 18 “is             
               the cooperating opposite part of the fastener 14” (col. 3, l. 28).  According to Ghanem, “[t]he                   









Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007