Appeal No. 2006-1688 Application 09/901,244 over Kerouac in view of Baum Kerouac discloses “a hand held test probe for use with ear test equipment” (col. 1, lines 5-6). The examiner argues that “it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time Applicant’s invention was made to provide the outer surface of an ear probe tip similar to that of Kerouac with a plurality of annular flanges in view of the teachings of Baum in order to automatically provide an acoustic seal with the outer ear cavity that prevents propagation of sound through the space of the ear cavity surrounding the exterior of the ear probe tip [Baum, col. 4, lines 10-17], where the probe tip of Kerouac would remain disposed proximate the second opening of the ear insert of Kerouac as illustrated in Figures 2 and 8 of Kerouac” (answer, page 12).1 The appellants argue that “if the ear insert of Baum were used with the ear probe of Kerouac, the probe tip of 1 The resilient cuff (12) used by Kerouac provides an air- tight or hermetic seal with the canal (9) walls (col. 2, lines 19-22). 7Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007