Ex Parte Ota et al - Page 1



                   The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                             
                            for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                    

                          UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                       
                                                    ____________                                                          
                                 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                       
                                              AND INTERFERENCES                                                           
                                                    ____________                                                          
                              Ex parte NOBUHIKO OTA, TOSHIKAZU HAMAO                                                      
                                            and YOSHIFUSA TSUBONE                                                         
                                                    ____________                                                          
                                                  Appeal 2006-1736                                                        
                                               Application 10/471,180                                                     
                                               Technology Center 1700                                                     
                                                    ____________                                                          
                                            Decided: September 29, 2006                                                   
                                                    ____________                                                          

                 Before KIMLIN, PAK, and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.                                             
                 KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                      

                                         REMAND TO THE EXAMINER                                                           
                         We remand the application to the Examiner for further consideration                              
                 and explanation of issues raised by the record.  37 C.F.R. § 41.50(a)(1)                                 
                 (2005); Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP) § 1211 (8th ed.,                                     
                 Rev. 3, August 2005).                                                                                    









Page:  1  2  3  4  5  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007