Ex Parte Thayer - Page 3


                   Appeal No. 2006-1764                                                                                             
                   Application No. 10/177,965                                                                                       

                   processor-based1 customer workstation 10, and the service history of the processor-based                         
                   device is received at the processor-based device as a historical record associated with the                      
                   trouble ticket (column 4, lines 3 through 8 and 27 through 34; column 14, line 63 through                        
                   column 15, line 2; column 17, lines 17 through 20).  The software services resident on the                       
                   processor-based device permit the maintenance of the trouble ticket and the historical                           
                   record (column 5, line 59 through column 6, line 4).  Any processor-based device service                         
                   data automatically entered into the fields of the trouble ticket is a data structure of the                      
                   service history of the processor-based device (column 13, lines 34 through 41).  We                              
                   additionally agree with the examiner’s finding (answer, pages 10 and 11) that the                                
                   processor-based customer workstation provides a web-based page, and that the web-                                
                   based page comprises at least a portion of the information entered in the data structure                         
                   (column 7, lines 4 through 30).  The claims on appeal do not preclude other system                               
                   structure (e.g., the web servers 24) (Figure 1) from assisting in the creation of the web-                       
                   based page2 at the processor-based customer workstation (brief, pages 7 through 9; reply                         
                   brief, page 7).  Thus, the anticipation rejection of claims 1, 11 and 16 is sustained.                           
                           The anticipation rejection of claims 5, 6 and 13 is sustained because we agree                           
                   with the examiner’s finding (answer, page 4) that the software that provides the web-                            
                   based page at the processor-based customer workstation 10 makes the web-based page                               
                   accessible to the customer service platform 20a at a remote location (Figure 4).                                 



                                                                                                                                   
                   1 In appellant’s disclosure, the processor-based device is either the computer 102 or the storage device 104     
                   (Figure 1; paragraphs 0020, 0030, 0031, 0039, 0058).                                                             
                   2 Appellant’s disclosure states that the web-based page is created by either an embedded web server or by a      
                   remotely accessed web server (paragraphs 0033, 0039, 0047, 0055, 0058, 0092).                                    

                                                                 3                                                                  



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007