Appeal No. 2006-1778
Application 09/776,364
in each of the first and second test systems, identifying a file name of a first data
file to use in each of the first and second tests based on the plural parameters; and
the first and second test systems using the first data file in performing the
respective first and second tests.
The following references are relied on by the examiner:
Fujimori 5,517,892 May 21, 1996
Walls et al. (Walls) 5,848,410 Dec. 8, 1998
Fitting 5,857,192 Jan. 5, 1999
Gartner et al. (Gartner) 6,393,435 May 21, 2002
(Filed Sept. 22, 1999)
Talley 6,513,047 Jan. 28, 2003
(Filed Sept. 4, 1997)
Slutz 6,581,052 Jun. 17, 2003
(Filed Oct. 2, 2000)
Claims 1 through 14, 17 through 21 and 23 through 32 stand rejected under
35 U.S.C. § 103. In a first stated rejection, the examiner relies upon Slutz in view of
Fujimori as to claims 1, 2 and 5 through 13. In the examiner’s second and third stated
rejections, the examiner respectively adds Talley to the initial combination of
references as to claims 3, 4, 14, 17 through 19, 23, 24 and 27 through 32, with a
further addition of Walls as to claims 20, 21, 25 and 26. In a fourth stated rejection
the examiner relies upon Gartner and Fitting as to claims 1 through 14, 17 through 19,
23, 24 and 27 through 32, with the addition of Walls as to claims 20, 21, 25 and 26 in
a fifth stated rejection.
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007